In spite of the fact that triatomic molecules are the simplest polyatomic species, a thorough discussion of the theoretical background of their rotational spectra and energy level interactions would entail an extensive text in itself, and would require repetition of many excellent treatments readily available. Thus, the discussion which follows deals with the most common cases which will provide the user with the essential definition of quantum numbers, molecular parameters and basic relations employed in the analysis of rotational spectra. For the reader interested in a more detailed description of polyatomic rotational spectral measurements and analysis, we refer to texts on this subject by Townes and Schawlow [3], Gordy and Cook [4], Wollrab [5] and Kroto [6] which have both detailed and excellent discussions of all facets of rotational spectra. The spectroscopic notation employed follows, as closely as possible, the recommendations of the Joint Commission for Spectroscopy of the International Astronomical Union and the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics [7].
(eq1) 
The selection rules for rotational transitions of a linear polyatomic molecule
are
Since molecules are not rigid, the effects of molecular vibrations and centrifugal distortion must be included in the model in order to accurately fit the observed rotational spectra. The rotational energy levels are represented as:
(eq2) 
where B_{υ} is the rotational constant for the υ^{th} vibrational state, and D_{υ} and H_{υ} are the centrifugal distortion constants. The rotational constant can be expressed in terms of its equilibrium value, B_{e}, and rotationvibration interaction constants, α_{i}, as:
(eq3) 
neglecting higher order terms. Within this level of approximation rotational transitions from lower state J″ to upper state J′ are expressed:
(eq4) 
The treatment of rotational transitions in excited vibrational states requires
additional terms to account for the rotationvibration interactions. The
symmetry species of excited vibrational states are designated as
Σ, Π,
Δ, etc., when
Hyperfine structure is observable in a majority of the linear molecules tabulated here. Hyperfine structure stems from nuclear electric quadrupole interaction with the electric field gradient at the nucleus, magnetic interaction of nuclear spin with the field produced by molecular rotation, and interaction between the two nuclear spins. Basically, only the nuclear quadrupole and spinrotation effects have been observed in microwave rotational spectra, while all of the hyperfine structure interactions of a number of triatomics have been determined from molecular beam electric resonance studies. Since the treatment of these effects can become quite complex and often handled individually for each case, the reader is referred to the literature cited for particular formulations. Rather detailed general treatments of hyperfine structure in molecular spectra can be found in references [36] as well as in references to laboratory studies of individual species.
The most common case observed is that for triatomic molecules which contain one
nucleus with nuclear spin,
(eq5) 
where f(I,J,F) is Casimir's function which is
tabulated in Appendix I of reference [3] and
Appendix IV of reference [4]. Here F is
the total angular momentum quantum number, where
When the molecule exhibits hyperfine splittings from more than one nucleus, an
exact matrix diagonalization of the Hamiltonian is usually required. Although
the vector coupling model to be employed varies according to the magnitude of
the interaction between J,
(eq6a) 
(eq6b) 
For detailed discussions of the coupling schemes and matrix elements for multiple nuclear electric quadrupole interactions see [4] and [5].
The rotational energy levels are characterized by the three quantum numbers J_{K1,K+1} in the KingHainerCross notation. Here, since S=0, J is used rather than N for the rotational angular momentum. When S≠0 we will use N_{K1,K+1} to designate the rotational state and J for rotation plus electron spin and orbital angular momenta. The K_{1} subscript is the K value in the limiting case of prolate symmetrictop and K_{+1} corresponds to the limiting case for an oblate symmetrictop. Ray's asymmetry parameter, κ, is often used to characterize the degree of asymmetry:
(eq7) 
When A ≈ B, κ approaches +1 for the oblate case and when B ≈ C, κ approaches 1 for the prolate case.
(eq8a) 
(eq8b) 
When a triatomic molecule has a symmetry axis, for example in the XY_{2} molecules, only btype transitions can occur. In these cases one must also examine the nuclear spin statistics which influence both the selection rules and population of the rotational levels.
(eq9) 
where α,β = a,b, or c. For a planar molecule the following planarity relations reduce the six linear combinations of distortion constants to four and provide the determinable parameters shown in column 1 of table 2.1:
(eq10) 
(eq11) 
(eq12) 
(eq13) 
For nonplanar molecules Dreizler et al. [11,12] found the KivelsonWilson distortion constants were indeterminant. Watson [13,14] introduced a new relationship which allows the KivelsonWilson Hamiltonian to be expressed in terms of five independent centrifugal distortion coefficients, or linear combination of taus, which eliminates the indeterminancy noted by Dreizler et al. Much of the recent analysis of rotational spectra follow Watson's reformulation [15,16] in the form of a reduced Hamiltonian which simplified the computation of the energy levels.
KivelsonWilson parameters for planar molecules 
Kirchhoff parameters (following Watson [15])  Watson parameters [16] 

A′  
B′  
C′  
τ_{aaaa}  τ_{aaaa}  Δ_{J} 
τ_{bbbb}  τ_{bbbb}  Δ_{JK} 
τ_{abab}  τ_{cccc}  Δ_{K} 
τ_{aabb}  δ_{J}  
δ_{K}  
where

Since there is not a unique unitary transformation which allows the nine
KivelsonWilson parameters to be reduced to eight determinable parameters,
several variations of the Watson reduced Hamiltonians are commonly employed in
practice. The two most often employed result in the determinable parameters
listed in columns 2 and 3 of table 2.1. In reanalyzing the microwave
spectra of triatomic molecules, Kirchhoff's [10]
formulation has been used and the planarity conditions have been invoked in the
spectral fitting process to fix τ_{3}. See reference [10] for
additional details. The second commonly used formulation is described in detail
by Gordy and Cook [4]. Yamada and Winnewisser
[17] have examined the effects of employing
different reductions for the three King, Hairier and Cross axis representations
I^{r}, II^{r}, and III^{r}
[18]. They provide a useful set of relations between
the spectroscopic constants determined in the various reduction procedures and
discuss the implications of the τ defect
when employing the planarity conditions. When the spectral data requires a
higher order Hamiltonian, such as inclusion of P^{6} terms,
generally the firstorder perturbation treatment suggested by Watson
[16] has been used. For some light molecules such as
H_{2}O and H_{2}S even higher order terms were needed. See
Gordy and Cook [4] or the sources of the
spectroscopic constants quoted in the tables on these species.
a)  
b)  
c) 
These interactions and the Hamiltonian for such molecules are discussed by Lin [19], Van Vleck [20], Curl and Kinsey [21] and others. Curl and Kinsey [21] have summarized the spectroscopic constant notation employed in the various formulations and developed an alternate method which can be applied to the triatomic species. Since none of these species have been reanalyzed in the present work, the notation employed in the publications cited is followed in the present tables of spectroscopic constants.
